Cases 151 - 160 of 276
Aspinwall et al v. Paychex Business Systems Inc et al
as 2:2012cv03465
Plaintiff:
Lane Aspinwall and Electronic Document Discovery Storage and Access LLC
Defendant:
Paychex Business Systems Inc , Paychex Insurance Agency Inc , Paychex Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Lane v. North Charleston, City of et al
as 2:2012cv03135
Plaintiff:
Leila Lane
Defendant:
North Charleston, City of , Charleston, County of , South Carolina, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Bank of North Carolina v. Bouscaren et al
as 9:2012cv02767
Plaintiff:
Bank of North Carolina
Defendant:
Donna M Bouscaren , Paul Gregory Bouscaren , Mark Christopher Bouscaren and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Donna M Bouscaren , Paul Gregory Bouscaren , Marie-Lise Bouscaren and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
David M Kindle , Coastal Property Appraisals Inc and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Lane v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 0:2012cv02519
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lane
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stuckey v. Burleson
as 4:2012cv02383
Plaintiff:
Rayford Stuckey
Defendant:
David Lane Burleson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White v. Riley et al
as 1:2012cv02262
Plaintiff:
James W White
Defendant:
Tim Riley, Gary Lane, Jerry Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Lane
as 6:2012cv00955
Plaintiff:
Antoine Jefferson
Defendant:
Gary Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. McCabe
as 0:2012cv00912
Petitioner:
Christopher Lane
Respondent:
Wayne McCabe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Doctor v. USA
as 3:2012cv00832
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Frankie Lane Doctor, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
