Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 151 - 160 of 112,152
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00789
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00186
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 117 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00374
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
FISHBACK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00795
Plaintiff: MCKENZEY FISHBACK
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Montez v. Aarons et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff: Montez Rashaad Williams
Defendant: Aarons, Joseph Kraus, #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawkins v. Mawhorr et al
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff: Kameron Hawkins
Defendant: Adams County Sheriff Dan Mawhorr, Conrad Dyer, Cody Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff: Rochelle Hayes
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fadavi v. Ginn
as 4:2024cv00040
Plaintiff: Faraz Fadavi Akhavan Bonab
Defendant: Samuel Ginn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
PEACHER v. VANIHEL
as 2:2024cv00172
Petitioner: ROBERT PEACHER
Respondent: FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SANDERS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff: ULYSSES SANDERS
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CENTERION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?