Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 151 - 160 of 85,017
VIERA v. BARLETT
as 1:2024cv00049
Petitioner: WIGBERTO VIERA
Respondent: S. BARLETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nobblen v. Harry et al
as 4:2024cv00671
Plaintiff: William Nobblen
Defendant: Laure Harry, Kathy Brittain, County of Philadelphia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05314
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
IN RE: ANTHONY YORGEY
as 5:2024cv01748
Not Yet Classified: ANTHONY YORGEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheeler v. Cherry et al
as 3:2024cv00326
Plaintiff: Dustin Sheeler
Defendant: Cherry, Warholic, S. McCorkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROMAN v. QUINLAN et al
as 1:2024cv05267
Plaintiff: MIGUEL A. ROMAN
Defendant: J. QUINLAN, HICKOCK, S. PRINCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LITTLEJOHN v. BARLETT
as 1:2024cv00056
Petitioner: DONTA D. LITTLEJOHN
Respondent: WARDEN S. BARLETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DAVIS v. CFG HEALTH SYSTEM
as 1:2024cv05232
Plaintiff: REGINAL LEE DAVIS
Defendant: CFG HEALTH SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASTRO-MOTA v. CLARK et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01622
Plaintiff: SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant: WARDEN TERREA MOJOR CLARK, C.O. OFFICER, LISA DURANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Reed v. Commissioner United States Parole Commission, et al
as 24-1687
Plaintiff: ROBERT ANDREW REED, a/k/a Robert Andrew Bey
Defendant: COMMISSIONER UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and CHRISTOPHER WHITMER, U.S. Parole Examiner Employee

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?