Cases 151 - 160 of 12,484
Sabir v. Spokane County Jail Staff et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Joseph Omar Sabir
Defendant:
Spokane County Jail Staff and Naphcare Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
John Baker
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plechner v. Haynes
as 3:2024cv05187
Petitioner:
Richard Plechner
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harris
Defendant:
City of Seattle, City of Tukwila, Lisa Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ritenburgh v. Clark County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv05185
Plaintiff:
Sandra Ritenburgh
Defendant:
Clark County Jail, Clark County Sheriff's Office, Clark County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dominguez
as 2:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
Franklin C Smith
Respondent:
Levi Dominguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Adams v. Lanum et al
as 3:2024cv05034
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Adams
Defendant:
Bruce Lanum, Adam Clarino, Tony Donnington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Faustino-Anaya v. Andrewjeski
as 4:2024cv05011
Petitioner:
Arnulfo Faustino-Anaya
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bateman v. Hawk et al
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bateman
Defendant:
Jason Hawk, Robert Melvin, City of Newcastle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Bigelow et al
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
David Butler
Defendant:
Suzane Bigelow and King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
