Cases 161 - 170 of 437
Glover-Russell v. Thrasher et al
as 2:2017cv03208
Plaintiff:
Isaac Glover-Russell, Jr.
Defendant:
Chad Thrasher and Phillip Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simser v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2017cv03196
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Phillip Simser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jackman v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03176
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jackman
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gomez v. USA
as 2:2017cv02091
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Phillip Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Acuity Innovation and Design LLC v. Arizona Dental Professionals PC et al
as 2:2017cv01986
Plaintiff:
Acuity Innovation and Design LLC
Defendant:
Arizona Dental Professionals PC, T Phillip Shin, Unknown Shin and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Ohman #189498 v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv01928
Petitioner:
Phillip M Ohman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ohman #189498 v. Ryan
as 2:2017cv01927
Plaintiff:
Phillip M Ohman
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv01876
Defendant:
Phillip Z Saba, Unknown Lansden, Willie F Lansden and others
Plaintiff:
Saly Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Stuart et al v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2017cv01848
Defendant:
Unknown Phillips, David Smith, Unknown Kaufmann and others
Plaintiff:
Save Our Preserve Incorporated, Mark Stuart and Mark Stuart an Individual doing business as Save Our Preserve Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Shartle et al
as 4:2017cv00251
Petitioner:
Nigel Brown
Respondent:
JT Shartle and T Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
