Cases 161 - 170 of 177
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reed v. USA
as 3:2008cv00430
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Billy Wayne Reed
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Star Broadcasting, Inc. v. Reed Smith LLP
as 1:2008cv00616
Plaintiff:
Star Broadcasting, Inc.
Defendant:
Reed Smith LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reed v. Lewis et al
as 3:2008cv00201
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Reed
Defendant:
Michael Lewis, Roy Cherry, Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kassner v. Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority et al
as 1:2008cv00248
Plaintiff:
Robin Kassner and Robin Kassner
Defendant:
Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, Michael Jose Urbina, Naima Reed and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Trustees of the Roanoke Iron Workers Pension Fund et al v. B&M Steel Erectors, Inc. et al
as 7:2007cv00498
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Roanoke Iron Workers Pension Fund, Trustees of the Roanoke Iron Workers Trust Fund, Trustees of the Mid-Atlantic States District Council Participating Locals Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
B&M Steel Erectors, Inc. and Michael Reed
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
