Cases 161 - 170 of 22,005
Byerley v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Steven Dale Byerley
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pleasant v. Yescare (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Ray Dean Pleasant
Defendant:
Yescare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Scales v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Shane Scales
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poser Investments, Inc. v. Sharma et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Poser Investments, Inc.
Defendant:
Chiranji Sharma and Geea Sharma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bailey v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Christopher Randall Bailey
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Amanda G. Lee, Brittany Lee and Barbara G. Hadaway
Defendant:
Billy H. Chapman and USAA Casualty Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Tort Claim
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Dynamic Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Wendy's Inc.
as 2:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Wendy's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neff v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Anthony Neff
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
