Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 171 - 180 of 156,094
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11173
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11175
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
RIDER v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2024cv00156
Plaintiff: CASEY M RIDER
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Not Yet Classified: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Andersson
as 24-1426
Plaintiff: GREAT LAKES INSURANCE SE
Defendant: MARTIN ANDERSSON
John Doe, et al v. City of Boston, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and JAMES DOE
Defendant: BOSTON, MA, PAUL EVANS, individually, ROBERT DUNFORD, individually and others
Boniface, et al v. Viliena
as 24-1411
Plaintiff: DAVID BONIFACE, NISSANDRE MARTYR and JUDERS YSEME
Defendant: JEAN MOROSE VILIENA
Rosario v. Luna
as 24-1422
Petitioner: IVAN ROSARIO
Respondent: RICHARD A. LUNA, Warden, FCI Berlin
MACDONALD v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff: KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant: DANIEL JOHNSON, BRUCE KILE, BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR and others
Not Yet Classified: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Meka, et al v. Haddad, et al
as 24-1425
Plaintiff: ROHINI MEKA and SURESH CHIRUMAMILLA, individually and as father and next friend of PRANAV CHIRUMAMILLA
Defendant: HANI HADDAD, VALLEY WOMEN'S HEALTH GROUP, LLC and JOHN/JANE DOE
BOWMAN v. BERRY DUNN MCNEIL & PARKER LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff: MELODY BOWMAN
Defendant: BERRY DUNN MCNEIL & PARKER LLC and RELIABLE NETWORKS OF MAINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?