Cases 171 - 180 of 75,279
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Heon Yoo v. Brian Barker, et al
as 24-1833
Plaintiff:
HEON JONG YOO, Agent of Hank Yoo
Defendant:
BRIAN BARKER, ASMA NISSAR, CARRIER CLINIC PSYCHIATRISTS and others
Elmer Daniels v. City of Wilmington, et al
as 24-1808
Plaintiff:
ELMER DANIELS
Defendant:
CITY OF WILMINGTON and PHILLIP A. SAGGIONE, Esq.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
HARDAWAY v. HARDAWAY et al
as 2:2024cv01801
Plaintiff:
AVERY JAMES HARDAWAY
Defendant:
RAYMOND J HARDAWAY and METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrew Podems v. Union County Child Support Enforcement Unit, et al
as 24-1811
Plaintiff:
ANDREW M. PODEMS
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT UNIT, THERESA E. MULLER, Hearing Officer (spelling Muller?), JAMES HELY, Hearing Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
RP Wynstone, LP et al v. NEW HANOVER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
RP Wynstone, LP, REAL PRO ENTERPRISES, LP and Provident Trust Group, LLC
Defendant:
NEW HANOVER TOWNSHIP, NEW HANOVER TOWNSHIP AUTHORITY, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF NEW HANOVER TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
