Cases 171 - 180 of 85,114
Jomo Barnett v. Joseph Schember, et al
as 24-1801
Plaintiff:
JOMO BARNETT
Defendant:
JOSEPH SCHEMBER, Mayor, DAN SPIZABNEY, Chief of Police, ELIZABETH A. HIRZ, Head of D.A. Office and others
USA v. Vontez Scales
as 24-1779
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
VONTEZ SCALES, also known as Tez
IYAPO v. FISCUS et al
as 1:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
AJAMU OLUSHEGUN IYAPO and ONDRE RICHBURG
Defendant:
ACTIVITIES DIRECTOR B. FISCUS, L. REEHER, FACILITY MANAGER R. IRWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
VINCENT v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv01037
Petitioner:
MARC VINCENT
Respondent:
Superintendent, JOSEPH TERRA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRIS v. SOLANE et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
COREY L. HARRIS, SR.
Defendant:
NICOLE SOLANE, JUDGE MARSHALL J. PICCININI, COMMONWEALTH OF PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. SCHLUSSELFELD et al
as 3:2024cv02129
Plaintiff:
MAURICE M. YOUNG
Defendant:
MATTHEW SCHLUSSELFELD, DUANE GRADE, DANIEL CACICIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA. et al
as 5:2024cv01730
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. COHEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA., BRIDGE OF HOPE CHURCH, ERIC MUHLENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA. et al
as 5:2024cv01736
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. COHEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA., ERIC MUHLENBERG, CHRISTY BILLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 5:2024cv01737
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. COHEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA and DA JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. Arviza
as 1:2024cv00345
Petitioner:
Jorge Chavez
Respondent:
Warden Arviza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
