Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
CANALES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv01211
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CANALES, JR.
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Products Liability
SANTOS v. COOK INCORPORATED, et al.
as 1:2017cv04562
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
ANN SANTOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Products Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SANTOS v. KRUEGER
as 2:2017cv00288
Respondent:
J.E. KRUEGER
Petitioner:
JOSE HUMBERTO SANTOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Artis v. Santos et al
as 2:2016cv00108
Plaintiff:
Randall Artis
Defendant:
Adrian Santos and City of East Chicago, Indiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaPorte et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00648
Plaintiff:
Elisabeth LaPorte and Santo LaPorte
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANTOS-RANGEL v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2013cv00187
Petitioner:
JOSE SANTOS-RANGEL
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woodham v. Kellems et al
as 3:2013cv00169
Plaintiff:
Austin Woodham
Defendant:
Mike Kellems , Lisa Schoof, Michael L Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BELL v. ROYAL CORNICHE TRAVEL LTD. et al
as 1:2013cv00035
Defendant:
CHRISTINE NEVOGT, 1&1 INTERNET, INC., 10BEST, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
