Cases 11 - 20 of 205
Hastings v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00002
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc, Katelyn Payne, Sarah Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
Jolene Gunter Hastings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Woods (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00710
Plaintiff:
Steve M. Hale
Defendant:
Walter Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Nall et al
as 2:2019cv00702
Defendant:
Walter Vice Tutt, James Wallace Nall, III, Michael Hale Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Cloud v. Shedd et al
as 5:2019cv00805
Defendant:
Aubrey Taylor, Mike Hale, Kalyn Tyree and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Lynn Cloud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Department
as 2:2018cv02019
Plaintiff:
Marcus D. McQueen
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriff's Department and Mike Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Williams v. Hale
as 2:2018cv01749
Defendant:
Dan Smith, Omar, Mike Hale and others
Plaintiff:
D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Strickland v. Health Care Authority of Cullman County et al
as 5:2018cv01697
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Strickland
Defendant:
Health Care Authority of Cullman County, Betty Johnson and Mike Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson County Alabama et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv00626
Defendant:
Actavis Inc., McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Mike Hale, City of PleasantGrove Alabama, City of Hueytown Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hale County, Alabama v. Actavis LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00143
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Hale County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
