Cases 11 - 20 of 157
Loving v. Douglas
as 2:2023cv12287
Petitioner:
Joseph Loving
Respondent:
MaComb, People of and Adam Douglas
Kleyn et al v. Muskegon, County of et al
as 1:2023cv00928
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kleyn, Don Knox, T.J., Estate of Love and others
Defendant:
Muskegon, County of and Tony Moulatsiotis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
First Property Holdings, LLC et al v. Menominee, City of et al
as 2:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
First Property Holdings, LLC d/b/a RIZE, The Fire Station, LLC and First Property Holdings, LLC a Michigan limited liability company doing business as RIZE
Defendant:
City of Menominee, O.I. Holdings, LLC, Higher Love Corporation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Love #139864 v. GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceutical Company et al
as 1:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Allen Andrew Love #139864
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceutical Company, GlaxoSmithKline LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Loving #971900 v. Cummings
as 2:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Laron Loving #971900
Defendant:
Tina Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovely v. Standard Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv10365
Plaintiff:
Donald Lovely
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Love v. June et al
as 3:2021cv12621
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Love
Defendant:
William R. June and Pinellas Park Police Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
