Cases 11 - 20 of 231
Hairston v. Milhouse et al
as 2:2023cv12434
Plaintiff:
Ardell Hairston
Defendant:
Milhouse, Piva, Martinez and others
Bolden #835167 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bolden #835167
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Gretchen Whitmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Purdom et al
as 2:2023cv11413
Plaintiff:
DeJhan Sanders
Defendant:
Purdom, Wesker, Martinez and others
Teets et al v. T-Mobile Central LLC et al
as 2:2023cv11362
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Teets, Lisa Beck and Melissa Waara
Defendant:
T-Mobile Central LLC, Wyandotte Public School District, City of Wyandotte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Martinez, Sr. et al v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2023cv11350
Plaintiff:
Luis Antonio Martinez, Sr., Ana Martinez DeJesus, Yaritza Martinez DeJesus and others
Defendant:
County of Wayne, Dr. Carl Schmidt, Dr. Leigh Hlavaty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. Brandsafway Industries LLC
as 2:2023cv11206
Plaintiff:
Daniel Martinez
Defendant:
Brandsafway Industries LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Martinez v. Leadec Corp.
as 2:2023cv11110
Plaintiff:
Martin G Martinez
Defendant:
Leadec Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Nevills v. David et al
as 1:2023cv10839
Plaintiff:
Damion Nevills
Defendant:
Unknown David, Unknown Al-Rahmi, A. Dalton and others
Clark v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2023cv10759
Plaintiff:
James Lee Clark, III and Tebtu Shekem
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, 50th District Court, Michael C Martinez and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
