Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Pratt-Miller et al v. County of Arlington Virginia et al
as 1:2015cv00666
Plaintiff:
Gwennetta Pratt-Miller and Curtis Dawkins
Defendant:
Craig Patterson, Arlington County Sheriff's Office and Sheriff Beth Arther
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Concepcion v. Henrico Jail et al
as 2:2013cv00221
Plaintiff:
Francis Jose Concepcion, Jr.
Defendant:
Henrico Jail, Sinclair Angelo Allmond, Henrico Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00174
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thirdparty_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy-Jury Demand
Pamp v. Dawson et al
as 3:2012cv00855
Plaintiff:
Travis D. Pamp
Defendant:
R. Dawson, Pratt, Weathersby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00113
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
BI SOLUTIONS, LLC et al v. CAMPBELL
as 1:2012cv00098
Plaintiff:
Bi solutions, llc , Sharon J. Pratt and Keith E. Taylor
Defendant:
Stanley V. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Levora v. Pratt
as 1:2012cv00039
Plaintiff:
Caleb Stephen Levora
Defendant:
James Pratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Johnson
as 2:2010cv00599
Petitioner:
Valeton Pratt, Sr.
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Riches v. FAMM et al
as 3:2009cv00785
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
FAMM, Julie Stewart, Mary Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pratt v. Delta Airlines, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00764
Plaintiff:
Mary Pratt
Defendant:
Delta Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
