Cases 11 - 20 of 128
Sims-Lewis v. Marylin Moseby et al
as 1:2022cv01825
Plaintiff:
Raymond Sims-Lewis
Defendant:
Marylin Moseby, Balt City Police CM Sullivan and Maryland State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy et al v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022cv01730
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Murphy and Deborah Adams-Murphy
Defendant:
Charles Taylor, Katherine Renner, John Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud
Sullivan, Jr. et al v. Smith and Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01265
Plaintiff:
Donald Sullivan, Jr. and Debra Sullivan
Defendant:
Smith and Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Watson v. Sgt J Sullivan et al
as 1:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Rusasene Watson
Defendant:
Sgt J Sullivan, Baltimore County Police Department, Gail Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2021cv02167
Plaintiff:
Timothy Sullivan
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Sayal v. Kramer et al
as 8:2021cv02079
Plaintiff:
Pooja Sayal
Defendant:
Robert G. Kramer, Sr., Richard S. Lindahl, Syed T. Husain and others
Petitioner:
Lincolnshire Police Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lincolnshire Police Pension Fund v. Kramer et al
as 8:2021cv01595
Defendant:
George A. Joulwan, Kathryn C Zoon, Richard S. Lindahl and others
Plaintiff:
Lincolnshire Police Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foster v. Sullivan
as 1:2021cv01501
Plaintiff:
Florence Foster
Defendant:
Terry Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sullivan v. Sandlex Corporation
as 1:2021cv01072
Defendant:
Sandlex Corporation
Plaintiff:
Donna Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
