Cases 11 - 20 of 1,122
Su v. IProcess Online, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
iProcess Online, Inc., Michelle Leach-Bard and iProcess Online, Inc. 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada et al v. Stiles Consulting Firm LLC dba Stiles Foodservice & Stainless Installation et al
as 2:2023cv10858
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of Southern California Sheet Metal Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee and others
Defendant:
Stiles Consulting Firm LLC dba Stiles Foodservice & Stainless Installation, Corey William Stiles and Stiles Consulting Firm LLC doing business as Stiles Foodservice & Stainless Installation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Automobile Mechanics' Local No. 701 Union and Industry Welfare Fund et al v. Laborforce, LLC
as 1:2023cv16272
Plaintiff:
Automobile Mechanics' Local No. 701 Union and Industry Welfare Fund and Mechanics' Local 701 Defined Contribution 401(k) Plan
Defendant:
Laborforce, LLC, M & K Employee Services, Inc. and M & K Quality Truck Sales of Summit, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
McManus v. The Clorox Company
as 4:2023cv05325
Plaintiff:
James McManus
Defendant:
The Clorox Company and The Employee Benefits Committee of The Clorox Company 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Hammond Sheet Metal Inc et al
as 2:2023cv08736
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local 88 Section 401(k) Plan and others
Defendant:
Hammond Sheet Metal Inc, Gary Thomas Clutts and Cynthia Eileen Clutts
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Rockford Pipe Trades Industry Pension Fund et al v. Pearson Plumbing and Heating Company
as 1:2023cv14567
Plaintiff:
Rockford Pipe Trades Industry Pension Fund, Plumbers & Pipe Fitters Local 23, U.A. Health & Welfare Fund, Plumbers and Pipe Fitters Local 23 Fund for Training Journeyman and Apprentices and others
Defendant:
Pearson Plumbing and Heating Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rodriguez v. Intuit Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv05053
Plaintiff:
Deborah Rodriguez
Defendant:
Intuit Inc. and The Employee Benefits Administrative Committee of the Intuit Inc. 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 25 Welfare Fund et al v. Hirst Plumbing & Mechanical Services, Inc.
as 4:2023cv04157
Plaintiff:
Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 25 Welfare Fund, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 25 Pension Fund, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 25 Joint Apprenticeship Fund and others
Defendant:
Hirst Plumbing & Mechanical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Local 346 Saving and 401(k) Plan v. Mahkahta Consulting & Development Corp.
as 0:2023cv02962
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Local 346 Savings & 401(k) Plan
Defendant:
Mahkahta Consulting & Development Corp. doing business as Mahkahta Trucking
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
FINRA Pension/401(k) Plan Committee v. Lightning et al
as 1:2023cv02336
Plaintiff:
FINRA Pension/401(k) Plan Committee
Defendant:
Napoleon Roosevelt Lightning, Tyrene Huff, Lenora Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
