Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Green v. General Mills World Headquarters et al
as 0:2022cv02737
Plaintiff:
Courtney Green
Defendant:
General Mills World Headquarters and National Registered Agent Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Springer et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 0:2022cv01532
Plaintiff:
Courtney Springer and R.S.
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Walsh v. Shocinski, Jr. et al
as 0:2021cv01635
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Walsh
Defendant:
William Shocinski, Jr., Cloud X Vapes Forest Lake LLC, Vapes by Courtney, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Irwin v. Miles et al
as 0:2020cv00755
Defendant:
Kayla Taylor, Courtney Menten, Brian Ninneman and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry T Irwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daywitt v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2019cv02632
Defendant:
Justin Joslin, Brian Ninneman, Ryan Fahland and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth S. Daywitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeMay et al v. Mays et al
as 0:2019cv02463
Defendant:
Nicholas H. Rowe, Daniel P. Ledman, City of Minneapolis, Minnesota and others
Plaintiff:
CLE, Jennifer L.M. LeMay, VE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeMay et al v. Mays et al
as 0:2019cv02462
Defendant:
Nicholas H Rowe, Daniel P Ledman, Xfinity Home Security and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer LeMay, Courtney Livingston, CLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02212
Plaintiff:
Cecil Gilbert, Darius Hart, Devonte Sherod Harris and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, Does 1-50, 3M Company and others
Lawrence et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02202
Plaintiff:
Leonard Lee, Jeremy Blake Lopez, Shawn Martin and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Does 1-50, Aearo, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
