Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Saunders v. Smith et al
as 3:2009cv00815
Defendant:
R. Smith and R. N. Quick
Plaintiff:
Michael J. G. Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00152
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Quick v. O'Brien
as 7:2009cv00294
Petitioner:
Melvin Quick
Respondent:
Terry O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ryan v. Quick et al
as 4:2009cv00051
Plaintiff:
Mykal S. Ryan
Defendant:
Lee M. Quick and Lee M. Quick, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2701 Federal Communications Privacy Act
Hodges et al v. Sykora et al
as 3:2008cv00077
Plaintiff:
David Hodges, Quick-Clean, Inc. and Billiard Pro Shop, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert J. Sykora, Full Contact Sports, LLC and Billiard Club Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Quick v. American Standard, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv09288
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc., The Budd Company, Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Liggins v. William A. Hazel, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01084
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Liggins
Defendant:
William A. Hazel, Inc., Darrell Wolfe, Tommy Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Quick v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company
as 2:2007cv00350
Plaintiff:
Rodney Keith Quick
Defendant:
Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Hodges et al v. Sykora et al
as 3:2007cv00125
Plaintiff:
David Hodges, Quick-Clean, Inc. and Billiard Pro Shop, Inc.
Defendant:
Rob Sykora, Rob Sykora, Full Contact Sports, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
