Cases 11 - 20 of 21
YOUNG v. ROWLES et al
as 2:2018cv01738
Plaintiff:
CURTIS A. YOUNG
Defendant:
ADAM ROWLES, BARRY SMITH and GALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Blocker et al
as 4:2018cv00812
Plaintiff:
Angel Luis Thomas, Sr.
Defendant:
Tyree C Blocker , O.E. Rowles , Maurice A. Tomlinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWLES v. GGNSC ALTOONA HILLVIEW LP
as 3:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
EUGENE C. ROWLES
Defendant:
GGNSC ALTOONA HILLVIEW LP and GGNSC ALTOONA HILLVIEW GP LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROWLES v. COLVIN
as 3:2016cv00074
Plaintiff:
ALAN LEE ROWLES
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
NEXIUM (ESOMEPRAZOLE) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2014mc00225
Movant:
JEFFREY A. POTT , RICHARD S. BARKER , TERRI L. BOWMAN and others
Respondent:
ALL PLAINTIFFS IN IN RE NEXIUM (ESOMEPRAZOLE MAGNESIUM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION, MDL NO. 2409
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
WILLIAMS v. UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT. EMPLOYEES et al
as 2:2013cv07158
Plaintiff:
GARY D. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT. EMPLOYEES, WILLIAMS SMINKEY, MIKE PECKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Board of Supervisors of Rice Township et al
as 3:2011cv00756
Plaintiff:
Marcia Thomas
Defendant:
Board of Supervisors of Rice Township , Miller J. Stella, Jr. , George Venesky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWLES v. ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv91624
Plaintiff:
CHARLES H ROWLES
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, A P GREEN REFRACTORIES CO and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Johnson v. Watson et al
as 4:2008cv01026
Plaintiff:
Jamiel Johnson
Defendant:
Cindy G. Watson, Health Care Bureau John Doe, Raymond M. Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rowles v. Astrue
as 3:2008cv01006
Plaintiff:
Steven W. Rowles
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
