Cases 11 - 20 of 4,000
Munn v. Jewel Mechanical, LLC
as 3:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
William Munn
Defendant:
Jewel Mechanical, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Doe #049 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Doe #049
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #052 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
John Doe #052
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cumalander v. BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
William Mark Cumalander
Defendant:
BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Williams v. Eller
as 3:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Richard Williams
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. MANPOWER US INC., et al
as 2:2024cv02190
Plaintiff:
Jerrelle Williams
Defendant:
Manpower US Inc. doing business as Experis US, Inc., First Citizens Bancshares, Inc. doing business as First Citizens National Bank and First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company
Doe #058 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
John Doe #058
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Eller
as 3:2024cv00231
Petitioner:
Richard Williams
Defendant:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Florez-Ramirez v. Jacques Jones, et al.,
as 2:2024cv02335
Plaintiff:
Florez-Ramirez
Defendant:
Jacques Jones, Tracy Williams, Carlus Cleaves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Gerdau Ameristeel U.S. Inc.
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Linda Williams and Elmer Vernon Williams
Defendant:
Gerdau Ameristeel U.S. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
