Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Castillo v. Tutt et al
as 3:2020cv00254
Plaintiff:
Miguel R Castillo and Miguel Castillo
Defendant:
Elam and J Tutt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burbridge v. City of East Chicago et al
as 2:2019cv00454
Plaintiff:
Jamau Burbridge
Defendant:
Unknown East Chicago Police Officers, City of East Chicago, L Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASTILLO v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv03600
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
Raymond Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Castillo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
Caroline Castillo and Caroline M Castillo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Undetermined:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CASTILLO v. W.V.C.F. et al
as 2:2018cv00205
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN and W.V.C.F.
Petitioner:
JOSEPH P. CASTILLO
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CASTILLO v. BROWN et al
as 2:2018cv00181
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN and W.V.C.F.
Petitioner:
JOSEPH CASTILLO
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ARREOLA-CASTILLO v. USA
as 1:2017cv03437
Petitioner:
JESUS ARREOLA CASTILLO
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shah et al v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00815
Plaintiff:
Shah, Local 1500 UFCW, Rajesh M Shah and others
Defendant:
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Betsy J Bernard and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
