Cases 11 - 20 of 112
Hinton v. Boelhower
as 4:2023cv04120
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hinton
Defendant:
Chad Boelhower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milk v. Ripperda et al
as 4:2023cv04063
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Milk
Defendant:
Travis Ripperda, Unknown Persons and/or Entities System Risk Management Team, Riley DeGroot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palomarez v. Sullivan
as 5:2023cv05020
Petitioner:
Alexander Palomarez
Respondent:
Daniel Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Haggar et al
as 4:2023cv04024
Plaintiff:
Douglas Eugene Anderson
Defendant:
Daniel Haggar, Julie Risty and Minnehaha County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Netterville v. South Dakota State Penitary et al
as 4:2022cv04149
Defendant:
Timothy Schneider, South Dakota State Penitary, Daniel Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Netterville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. City of Sioux Falls et al
as 4:2022cv04147
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jose Gomez
Defendant:
City of Sioux Falls, Minnehaha County, Robin Houwman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knode v. Rothenberger et al
as 4:2022cv04148
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dwight Knode
Defendant:
Officer Sgt. Monty Rothenberger, Officer Kyler Pekarek, Officer Joseph Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eagle Construction, Inc. v. Johnson
as 4:2022cv04133
Plaintiff:
Eagle Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson doing business as The Roofing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Roedder v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2022cv01014
Petitioner:
Richard Keith Roedder
Respondent:
Daniel Sullivan and Mark A. Vargo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richmond v. Sullivan
as 5:2022cv05082
Petitioner:
Herbert Lee Richmond
Defendant:
Daniel Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
