Cases 11 - 20 of 115
Bennett v. Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Matthew David Bennett
Defendant:
Bedford County, Tennessee, Chad Graham, Tennessee State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham Group v. Fastenal Company
as 2:2022cv02760
Plaintiff:
Graham Group
Defendant:
Fastenal Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Graham v. Louisville Ladder, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
Amanda N Graham
Defendant:
Louisville Ladder, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bennett v. Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
Matthew David Bennett
Defendant:
Bedford County, Tennessee, Chad Graham, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Ford
as 3:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allan Graham
Defendant:
Jason K Ford and Haulers Ins. Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Leisure Pools USA Trading, Inc. v. Graham
as 3:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
Leisure Pools USA Trading, Inc. and Leisure Pools USA Trading, Inc. doing business as Explore Industries Services USA 1
Defendant:
Timothy W. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Huffman v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Terry Huffman, Jr
Defendant:
Bill Lee, David Rausch, James Berrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Wal-Mart, Inc. et al (TV2)
as 2:2021cv00127
Plaintiff:
Karen Graham
Defendant:
Wal-Mart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. Wal-Mart, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00126
Plaintiff:
Karen Graham
Defendant:
Wal-Mart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. Boyd
as 3:2021cv00272
Petitioner:
Garrick Graham
Respondent:
Bert C Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
