Cases 11 - 20 of 188
Mitchell v. Veta et al
as 2:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Mikeyla Kiera Mitchell
Defendant:
Veta, Marquell Barnes, Special coming Raleigh A Beard Alethia C Bryce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Blake v. Holloway et al
as 7:2023cv00381
Plaintiff:
Isaw Waleed Blake
Defendant:
Mr. Holloway, Mr. Harold W. Clarke, Mss. E. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annarelli v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00308
Petitioner:
David J. Annarelli
Respondent:
Harold Clarke and Warden Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bartlett v. Hicks et al
as 1:2023cv00655
Plaintiff:
Rodney Bartlett
Defendant:
T. Hicks, Dunnaway, Brockers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Amoah
as 2:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Dwayne R. Hicks, Jr.
Defendant:
Amoah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Centennial Bank v. Hicks
as 3:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Centennial Bank
Defendant:
Robert E Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Mills v. Clarke, et al.
as 1:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Vernon Jermaine Mills
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Esker Tatum, Donald Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Youngkin et al
as 3:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Thomas B. Simpson
Defendant:
Glenn Youngkin, Robert Mosier, Jason Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Youngkin, et al.
as 3:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Thomas B. Simpson
Defendant:
Glenn Youngkin, Robert Mosier, Jason Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Shaconda L. Hicks
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
