Cases 11 - 20 of 81
HOOK et al v. NEMACOLIN WOODLANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00387
Plaintiff:
CHERYL HOOK and DAVID SEMAN
Defendant:
NEMACOLIN WOODLANDS, INC. a Pennsylvania corporation doing business as NEMACOLIN WOODLANDS RESORT, NEMACOLIN, INC. and NWL, CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
HOOKS v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTION et al
as 2:2020cv01116
Defendant:
SAMIRRAH MINNIS, TANISHA DAVIS, MILANO GIANNONE and others
Plaintiff:
OMAR HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. MOOREFIELD et al
as 2:2019cv02891
Defendant:
SATELLITE'S, TCB.GOV, NRC.GOV and others
Plaintiff:
NEAL D. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HOOKS v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2018cv05507
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, KEVIN M. CONROY, WARDEN DAVID BARNE and others
Plaintiff:
OMAR HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN HOOK v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2018cv05425
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
NORENE VAN HOOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOOKS v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv05346
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, BAYER U.S., LLC, BAYER ESSURE INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LENORA HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOOK v. SMITH et al
as 2:2018cv04635
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
BRIAN HOOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOOKS v. MINCEY
as 2:2018cv03351
Plaintiff:
TARIK HOOKS
Defendant:
MR. KEVIN V. MINCEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
