Cases 11 - 20 of 1,365
JONES v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
WARDEN, BENNETT, OFFICERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. MAJESTIC CARE CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
TEDDIE B JONES and TEDDIE JONES
Defendant:
MAJESTIC CARE CENTER, MAJESTIC NURSING HOME, DAVID EARLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
JONES v. BONNER et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
BONNER, REED, POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts, G- Lewis, Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 3:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts, G- Lewis, Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Moorman v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Kir Moorman
Defendant:
Jones and Garcia
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Dedrick Johnson
Defendant:
Galipeau, Jones and Arnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Marthakis
as 3:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Gregory A Jones and Gregory Jones
Defendant:
Nancy Marthakis
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v White County Jail
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jerren Jones
Defendant:
White County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
