Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Joyner v. Asendia USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04440
Plaintiff:
Tamona Joyner
Defendant:
Asendia USA, Inc. and Accu Staffing Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ATWOOD v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2020cv01309
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHEAL ZAKEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF WESTMORELAND
Petitioner:
LEE JOYNER ATWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOYNER v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv04915
Plaintiff:
NIAMA JOYNER
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JOYNER v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv03479
Plaintiff:
THEO JOYNER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOE 1-3 and CHRISTOPHER HULMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOYNER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv02090
Defendant:
JAMIE LUQUIS, TAMMY FERGUSON and JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOYNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOYNER v. CITY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2019cv00630
Defendant:
CHESTER DOWNS AND MARINA LLC, CITY OF CHESTER, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
LISA JOYNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joyner et al v. Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01995
Plaintiff:
Lucille Joyner , Robert Dressler and Jason McCloe
Defendant:
Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. , BT-Twiss Transport, LLC , Twiss Transport, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDWARDS v. DOC HOUTZDALE et al
as 3:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARDS
Defendant:
DOC HOUTZDALE, JOYNER and SHERYL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOYNER v. COLVIN
as 2:2016cv00524
Plaintiff:
NIAMA JOYNER
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JOYNER et al v. R.E. HOOPER SALVAGE LLC et al
as 5:2015cv06584
Plaintiff:
LAVERN JOYNER
Defendant:
R.E. HOOPER SALVAGE LLC, EDWARD T. WALKER and A&B CONSULTING
Thirdparty_defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
