Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00227
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00008
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Mitchell et al v. Diallo et al
as 8:2019cv00570
Defendant:
Phillips Manufacturing Co. of Ohio, LLC, Pathe Diallo, Werner Leasing, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ross Mitchell and Blanca Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bogenreif v. Frakes et al
as 4:2019cv03101
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Mitchell L Bogenreif
Respondent:
Department of Correctional Services, Scott R. Frakes and State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2019cv00124
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
John W. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00107
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00501
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kurtz v. Baldwin et al
as 8:2018cv00243
Defendant:
Gina Baldwin, Jason Baldwin and Mitchell
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Kurtz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
M. Lowe Consulting Services, LLP et al v. NationalAssociation of Small Trucking Companies
as 8:2018cv00026
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Lowe, Mitchell Lowe and M. Lowe Consulting Services, LLP
Defendant:
National Association of Small Trucking Companies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
West v. Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv03064
Defendant:
Brad Johnson, Robert Mitchell and Andrew Truslow
Plaintiff:
Troy Lee West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
