Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Rembold v. Reilly
as 1:2018cv02803
Defendant:
James Reilly
Plaintiff:
Donald G. Rembold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
The Board of Regents of The University of Texas System v. IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
as 1:2018cv02513
Defendant:
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
Petitioner:
InvotexIP, Debora Stewart and Kristen Reilly
Plaintiff:
The Board of Regents of The University of Texas System
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
National Electrical Benefit Fund v. O'Reilly
as 8:2017cv02286
Plaintiff:
National Electrical Benefit Fund
Defendant:
Cyril O'Reilly
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Reilly Construction Inc. v. Sabree, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00403
Plaintiff:
Reilly Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Sabree, Inc. and Aegis Security Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
Sabree, Inc. and Aegis Security Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Reilly Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Tunstall v. Hogan et al
as 8:2015cv01580
Plaintiff:
Marcus Tunstall
Defendant:
Larry Hogan, George C. Edwards, Joseph M Getty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
National Electrical Benefit Fund v. O'Reilly
as 8:2015cv00561
Defendant:
Cyril O'Reilly
Plaintiff:
National Electrical Benefit Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lemon v. Foard et al
as 1:2013cv03890
Plaintiff:
Arron Frederick Lemon
Defendant:
Brendan Foard, Ben C. Clyburn, John P. McKenna, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00749
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
