Cases 11 - 20 of 112
PHILLIPS v. FAWVER et al
as 1:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
Z. FAWVER, WILLIAMS, JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kerley v. Servies et al
as 4:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Richard Kerley
Defendant:
Bradley Robert Servies, Israel Z Salazar and Lafayette City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
S. A. et al v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company et al
as 2:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
S. A., C. A. 1, C. A.2 and others
Defendant:
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, The Chemours Company, Hammond Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
TROTTMAN v. BOROD et al
as 1:2022cv01872
Plaintiff:
MYLES TROTTMAN
Defendant:
AUREL BOROD and Z TRANS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Henderson v. Hahn et al
as 3:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Shonta Ebony Sharee Henderson
Defendant:
Hahn and Captain Z
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, K. GILMORE, THOMAS WELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor et al v. BW Wings Management, LLC
as 1:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Nick A. Taylor, Amber N Taylor and Z. T.
Defendant:
BW Wings Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Henderson v. Harris et al
as 3:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Shonta Ebony Sharee Henderson
Defendant:
Harris, Russ Olmstead and Captain Z
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOUYE v. HOWARD et al
as 1:2021cv02968
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD DEAN BOUYE, JR.
Defendant:
T. HOWARD, MARTZ, COOKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kyles v. Warden
as 3:2021cv00909
Petitioner:
Leon Z Kyles, Jr
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
PUTNAMVILLE E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
