Cases 11 - 20 of 89
ALI v. USA
as 1:2022cv00763
Petitioner:
HASSAN SHARIF ALI
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DUNBAR v. ALI et al
as 1:2022cv00597
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER DUNBAR
Defendant:
ADDUL RAHMAN EL ALI, JACK LAMBERT, CLAY MAGUIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
ALI v. USA
as 1:2022cv00591
Petitioner:
HASSAN SHARIF ALI
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hunter v. Western Express, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
Melvin Hunter
Defendant:
Western Express, Inc. and Jamal Ali
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Ali v. Assurance IQ et al
as 5:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Mariama Nadira Ali
Defendant:
Assurance IQ and Prudential Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Sheikh v. Buffaloe
as 5:2022hc02092
Petitioner:
Ali Mahamed Sheikh
Respondent:
Eddie M. Buffaloe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALI v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2022cv00259
Petitioner:
ABDULKADIR S ALI
Respondent:
EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clervrain et al v. Tillis et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Manetiony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
Thom Tillis, Sydney Batch, Madison Cawthorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ali v. Buffaloe
as 3:2022cv00110
Petitioner:
Abdulkadir S Ali
Respondent:
Eddie M. Buffaloe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALI v. BUFFALOE ET AL
as 1:2022cv00159
Petitioner:
Abdulkadir S Ali
Respondent:
EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR. and NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
