Cases 11 - 20 of 20
TARIN v. MORALES et al
as 1:2015cv05943
Plaintiff:
ALEJANDRO A. TARIN
Defendant:
RUBEN MORALES, COOKE, MARILYN ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
TURNER v. RODGER et al
as 1:2015cv05499
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. TURNER
Defendant:
M. RODGER, J.T. SHARTLE, ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
AL-HAJ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv12805
Plaintiff:
AHMED MOHAMMED AL-HAJ
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Jeff Grondolsky, CLINICAL DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AL-HAJ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv00070
Plaintiff:
AHMED MOHAMMED AL-HAJ
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JEFF GRONDOLSKY, CLINICAL DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COFFEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
JOHN COFFEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN B. MORALES, M. ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COFFEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2014cv02175
Plaintiff:
JOHN COFFEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN B. MORALES, M. ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. SHARTLE et al
as 1:2014cv02469
Plaintiff:
RALPH CLARK
Defendant:
J.T. SHARTLE, M. ANGUD, MLP and R. MORALES, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLENN v. F.C.I. FAIRTON et al
as 1:2014cv02050
Plaintiff:
KEVIN GLENN
Defendant:
F.C.I. FAIRTON, D. NARDELLI, LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Sharpe v. Ediberto Medina, et al
as 11-3243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SHARPE
Defendant - Appellee:
EDIBERTO MEDINA, DIANE HESS, R.N., M. ANGUD, M.L.P. and others
SHARPE v. MEDINA et al
as 1:2010cv04276
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EDWARD SHARPE
Defendant:
EDIBERTO MEDINA, DIANE HESS, MARYLIN ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
