Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Rathbun et al v. Ford et al
as 1:2019cv00421
Plaintiff:
Amanda N Curtis and Anthony L Rathbun
Defendant:
County Jay, Dwane Ford, Sheriff Dwane Ford and others
Not Classified By Court:
James A Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAVISON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv00924
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. DAVISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALINSKI v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv00258
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. HALINSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VAUGHN v. USA
as 2:2016cv00364
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ANTHONY L. VAUGHN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SMITH v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2013cv00156
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS and MICHAEL ZENK
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. ZENK
as 1:2012cv00799
Petitioner:
ANTHONY L. SMITH
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZENK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. NALLY et al
as 2:2011cv00194
Defendant:
CHARLES HAWKINS and JOHN NALLY
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2011cv00225
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Brown
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DANIELS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv00637
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. DANIELS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SMITH v. PETERS et al
as 3:2009cv00101
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. SMITH
Defendant:
GIL PETERS, RICHARD NEWTON, ALLEN ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
