Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Hamilton v. Adams County, Mississippi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00034
Plaintiff: Charles Leavell Hamilton
Defendant: Adams County, Mississippi, Adams County Sheriff's Office, Travis Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Mayfield et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv00235
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: Chuck Mayfield, Adams County Sheriff Department, Karen Ewing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock County Board of Supr, et al v. Karen Ruhr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-60614
Plaintiff - Appellant: HAZLEHURST, MISSISSIPPI BRANCH OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, NANETTE THURMOND-SMITH, PIKE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRANCH OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Movant - Appellant: PAMELA JEFFERSON, GREGORY PARTMAN, LASTER SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee: COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI DEMOCRATIC PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI REPUBLICAN PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee: JIM HOOD
Shaidnagle et al v. Adams County, Mississippi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv00112
Plaintiff: Jumel H. Shaidnagle and Estate of Nicholas L. Pastor
Defendant: Adams County, Mississippi , Adams County Sheriff's Department, Charles R. Mayfield, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams County, Mississippi v. Diversified Computer Systems of No. Chas., Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv00145
Plaintiff: Adams County, Mississippi
Defendant: Diversified Computer Systems of No. Chas., Inc. and Angie Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Collier v. Adams County, Mississippi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv00133
Plaintiff: Camilla Collier
Defendant: Adams County, Mississippi, John Does 1-10 and Charles R. Chuck Mayfield, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hancock County Board of Supr, et al v. Karen Ruhr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-60446
Plaintiff - Appellant: HAZLEHURST, MISSISSIPPI BRANCH OF THE NAACP, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, NANETTE THURMOND-SMITH, PIKE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRANCH OF THE NAACP, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI DEMOCRATIC PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI REPUBLICAN PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and others
Felter et al v. Brown et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00046
Plaintiff: Erika Felter and Jonathan Felter
Defendant: Angie Brown , Darryl Longino , Adams County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams County Mississippi Branch of the NAACP et al v. Adams County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 5:2011cv00030
Plaintiff: Adams County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP and Jacqueline Marsaw
Defendant: Adams County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors , Adams County, Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee , Adams County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee and others
Intervenor_defendant: Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lofton et al v. Adams County, Mississippi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2007cv00080
Plaintiff: Willis Donald Lofton and Karen Lofton
Defendant: Adams County, Mississippi, Adams County, Mississippi, Ronny Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?