Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Mims v. Bradshaw et al
as 6:2020cv06144
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Paul Mims and Abdullah Al Karim
Defendant:
Major Hotts, Mrs. Thornburg, Director Jerry Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodds v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2020cv01241
Plaintiff:
Al Dodds
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carter et al v. FedEx Ground Package Systems Inc et al
as 4:2020cv01159
Plaintiff:
Jason Legros, Mark Carter and Michel Legros, Jr
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package Systems Inc and Samir Safaa Sobhi Al-Kayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Velazquez v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
as 5:2020mc00062
Plaintiff:
Clemente Velazquez
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
Salam v. Blend et al
as 4:2020cv00462
Defendant:
Blend, Payne, Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Minal Jabbar Salam and Al Jabbar Salam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Twin Brothers Inc v. Windsor Capital LP et al
as 4:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
Twin Brothers Inc
Defendant:
Windsor Capital LP and Al Rajabi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Naumann v. Roork et al
as 1:2019cv00092
Plaintiff:
Raymond Brian Naumann
Defendant:
Does "Terry", "Hunter", "Jacob", "Mr. Bill", Jailors Fulton County, John Cawvey, Joann Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tierra VeTierra Verde Escarde Escape, LLC et al v. The Brittingham Group, LLC et al
as 5:2019mc00094
Defendant:
Brian D. Britttsan, John C. Nock, The Brittingham Group, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Tierra VeTierra Verde Escarde Escape, LLC et al
Garnishee:
Simmons Bank
Phelps v. Roork et al
as 1:2019cv00073
Defendant:
John Cawvey, Joann Cunningham, Al Roork and others
Plaintiff:
Logan Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Rooke et al
as 1:2019cv00064
Defendant:
Sarah Warden, Al Rooke, John Cawvey and others
Plaintiff:
James Henry Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
