Cases 11 - 20 of 1,306
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Burnsworth v. Sellers et al
as 2:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Max Burnsworth
Defendant:
Trent Alexander Sellers, Brian Edward Ries, Justin Matthew DePalma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
TICE v. WILSON et al.
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT TICE
Defendant:
HARRY E. WILSON, PA STATE POLICE, MEGAN'S LAW SECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WADE v. C.O. CARTER et al
as 2:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
PAUL ALEXANDER WADE, 3RD
Defendant:
C.O. CARTER, C.O. PEEPLES and C.O. SHEPERD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nunn v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01130
Plaintiff:
Alexander W Nunn
Defendant:
CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC. and COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Interested Party:
KENNETH HASSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
IN RE: RIVERA
as 2:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER RIVERA
Defendant:
FAMILY COURT OF PHILADELPHIA CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STOCKTON et al v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON, THOMAS W. MCCUNE, BRIAN NELSON and others
Defendant:
LAUREL HENRY, SUPERINTENDANT R. IRWIN, DEPUTY SUPT. I. GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, G. LETTLE, G. LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
