Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Waters v. United States of America
as 0:2022cv01631
Petitioner:
Amber Denise Waters
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv01459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Owens v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv01059
Plaintiff:
Perrin Amber Owens
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Glover v. Wells Fargo et al
as 0:2022cv00928
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Glover
Defendant:
Wells Fargo, Karen Lawson, Amber H. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hardtke v. City of East Grand Forks et al
as 0:2021cv02733
Plaintiff:
Amber Hardtke
Defendant:
City of East Grand Forks, Rod Hajicek, Tony Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valiant v. Leonard, MD et al
as 0:2021cv00072
Defendant:
Amanda Ross, Todd Leonard, MD, MEnD Correctional Care, PLLC and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Valiant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham et al v. Nelson et al
as 0:2020cv01975
Defendant:
Peter A. Cahill, Nicholas Bouleris, Nathan H. Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jermaine Jackson and William Charles Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Graham v. Nelson et al
as 0:2020cv00646
Defendant:
Andrew H. Mohring, Erica H. MacDonald, Justin A. Wesley and others
Plaintiff:
William Charles Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haugen et al v. Polk County Department of Social Services et al
as 0:2020cv00174
Defendant:
Pete Sedgeman, PCSS- Workers, Amber Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Haugen and Kelly Haugen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walsh et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02223
Plaintiff:
Steven Yinger, Karen Wilson, Neil Whitt and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, 3M Company, Aearo Holdings, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
