Cases 11 - 20 of 265
Ambriz v. Hegar
as 23-50582
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rolando Ambriz
Defendant / Appellee:
Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, in his official and individual capacities
Nava Ambriz v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv00943
Plaintiff:
Bernabe Nava Ambriz
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AMBRIZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19106
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN AMBRIZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cavazos v. Ambriz, et al
as 3:2023cv01815
Plaintiff:
Robert Cavazos
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Ambriz and Gasca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Rosa Ambriz Gonzalez
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., John Doe and XYZ Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Trevino v. Dotson et al
as 3:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
Robert Trevino
Defendant:
E. Dotson, T. Ross, S. Newcomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edith Gomez et al v. Catlin Insurance Company, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00662
Plaintiff:
Edith Gomez, Damian Rios, Eileen E. Salinas and others
Defendant:
Catlin Insurance Company, Inc. and DOES 2 to 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
Ambriz Tapia v. Garland
as 23-72
Petitioner:
BENICIA AMBRIZ TAPIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Omniprint International Inc v. Edgar Silva Ambriz et al
as 8:2022cv02313
Plaintiff:
Omniprint International Inc
Defendant:
Edgar Silva Ambriz, Maria Eugenia Ambriz, Sergio Ramirez and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
