Cases 11 - 20 of 88
Calderon-Amezquita v. Rivera-Cruz, et al
as 23-1091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YEMAL CALDERN-AMZQUITA, in his personal capacity and as the sole heir of his late father Carmelo Calderon-Marrero and YEMAL CALDERON-AMEZQUITA, in his personal capacity and as the sole heir of his late father Carmelo Calderon-Marrero
Defendant / Appellee:
VICTOR RIVERA-CRUZ, DOCTORS' CENTER HOSPITAL BAYAMON, INC., ANDRES AVILA-GONZALEZ and others
Interested Party:
DORIS AMEZQUITA, ANIBAL CALDERON and ALFREDO ANTONIO CASTELLANOS BAYOUTH
USA v. Sanchez-Segura
as 22-50866
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Angel Adrian Sanchez-Segura
USA v. Morquecho-Sanchez
as 22-50631
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Angel Morquecho-Sanchez
Carter v. Banking Department et al
as 5:2022cv00569
Plaintiff:
Ellery Carter
Defendant:
Banking Department, Bexar County Sheriffs, San Antonio Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conde-Sanchez v. Garland
as 21-9603
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL CONDE-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Hernandez-Sanchez v. Garland
as 21-1039
Petitioner:
JOSE ANGEL HERNANDEZ-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
RIVERA-SANCHEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv30659
Plaintiff:
ANGEL RIVERA-SANCHEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. David Sahakian
as 21-50033
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID MICHAEL SAHAKIAN, AKA Miguel Angel Corraliza Sanchez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sanchez v. Mambo et al
as 3:2020cv03705
Plaintiff:
Angel Roque Sanchez
Defendant:
Gregory Kanyi Mambo and Marten Transport Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Angel Sanchez Cedeno
as 20-14624
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGEL ANTONIO SANCHEZ CEDENO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
