Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Jonathan Anthony Mendez v. People of the State of California
as 5:2018cv02285
Petitioner:
Jonathan Anthony Mendez
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mendez v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2017cv01170
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mendez
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mendez v. The Procter & Gamble Company et al
as 1:2017at00656
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mendez
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company and Does 1 - 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GAGNON v. FITZPATRICK et al
as 1:2015cv00355
Plaintiff:
SCOTT RICHARD GAGNON
Defendant:
JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, RODNEY BOUFFARD, TROY ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank Anthony Mendez v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2015cv03712
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Frank Anthony Mendez
Ericson v. Magnusson, et al
as 13-1821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC ERICSON
Defendant:
MARTIN MAGNUSSON, Individually and in his official capacity, CORIZON, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH PONTE, official capacity only, PATRICIA BARNHART, official capacity only, SCOTT BURNHEIMER, official capacity only and others
ERICSON v. MAGNUSSON et al
as 2:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
ERIC ERICSON
Defendant:
MARTIN MAGNUSSON, JOSEPH PONTE, PATRICIA BARNHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley v. Belcher et al
as 5:2012cv03089
Plaintiff:
Aaron R. Stanley
Defendant:
Eric R. Belcher, Thomas J. Schmitt, Anthony Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Mark Mendez
as 11-50429
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY MENDEZ
Michael Mendez, et al v. James Keeling, et al
as 11-55719
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL MENDEZ, MARK ANTHONY MENDEZ and BRENDA MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES W. KEELING, KAREN DICK, QUALITY CONNECTIONS SALES AND INSTALLATION, LTD., a Canadian corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
