Cases 11 - 20 of 83
Pitts v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 2:2023cv02137
Plaintiff:
Christian Pitts
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Wellpath Healthcare Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Aramark et al
as 2:2023cv02020
Plaintiff:
Marlo S. Watkins
Defendant:
Aramark, Shirley Hayslett and F/N/U Kesha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Helton et al
as 2:2022cv02877
Plaintiff:
Diane West
Defendant:
Lisa Helton, Stanley Dickerson, Kelley Shakera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saulsberry v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 2:2021cv02239
Plaintiff:
Lillian Saulsberry
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Floyd v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00229
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, LLC and Aramark Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ronald Curtis Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tankesly Jr v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00017
Defendant:
Ralph Adkinson, Kevin Genovese, Christa Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Clavin Tankesly Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chomsky et al v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00112
Plaintiff:
Don Chomsky and Amy Chomsky
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kail v. Lowe et al
as 2:2019cv02820
Defendant:
James A. Lowe and Aramark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Dylan S. Kail
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Food Service Aramark et al
as 3:2019cv00313
Defendant:
Food Service Aramark, Tony Parker, Hutchison and others
Plaintiff:
Prentice Farrell Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
