Cases 11 - 20 of 144
Thompson et al v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv01294
Plaintiff:
Camilla Thompson, Rob Burton and Alice Speake
Defendant:
Alice Williams, Jimmie Coleman, William Harden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Bailey v. Birmingham, City of et al
as 2:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Roberta Bailey
Defendant:
Birmingham, City of, Randall Woodfin, Brian Kilgore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Norsworthy et al
as 2:2022cv01616
Plaintiff:
Jeremy C Williams
Defendant:
J Norsworthy and Birmingham, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mejia v. Birmingham City of et al
as 2:2022cv01087
Plaintiff:
Clementina Ortiz Mejia
Defendant:
Birmingham City of, Brandon Jones and Luxe Ultra Lounge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Birmingham, City of v. Trane US Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00541
Plaintiff:
Birmingham, City of
Defendant:
Trane US Inc, Richard Carson and Daniel Shabo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Price v. Birmingham City Jail et al
as 2:2021cv01475
Plaintiff:
Alfago Price, Jr
Defendant:
Birmingham City Jail, Corizon, Jeff Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harding et al v. Birmingham, City of
as 2:2021cv01002
Plaintiff:
Samantha Harding and Moneka Chante Moore
Defendant:
Birmingham, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
