Cases 11 - 20 of 92
GRIFFIN v. STATE OF INDIANA IDOC et al
as 1:2022cv02052
Plaintiff:
OSCAR K. GRIFFIN
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA IDOC, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, BOWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. ADULT DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv01684
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR
Defendant:
ADULT DETENTION CENTER, C.O SAUERS, WELLPATH COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. BOWEN et al
as 1:2022cv01683
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR
Defendant:
BOWEN, HAMBLEM, STOKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIDER v. COLUMBIA INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2022cv01520
Plaintiff:
KARI GRIDER
Defendant:
COLUMBIA INSURANCE COMPANY and REESE BOWEN
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
TRIPP v. COLEMAN et al
as 1:2022cv01200
Plaintiff:
TERRY WILLIAM TRIPP, SR.
Defendant:
COLEMAN, A. TRIVETT, EADS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DONALDSON v. DUGAN et al
as 1:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
AARON DONALDSON
Defendant:
DUGAN, PRUET, PRINCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HATTON v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv02737
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY N. HATTON
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, FETZ, SONYA PHIPPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWENS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv01510
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BOWENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOBBS v. BOWEN
as 4:2021cv00060
Respondent:
CHARLES BOWEN
Petitioner:
JAMES DOBBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CERVANTES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2021cv00736
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and B. BOWEN
Plaintiff:
JOSE CERVANTES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
