Cases 11 - 20 of 59
BRAY v. RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER et al
as 1:2021cv02522
Defendant:
HAWK, MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM BRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAY v. COOK INCORPORATED, et al.
as 1:2021cv02513
Plaintiff:
DAWN BRAY
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL INC, IVC FILTERS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS et al v. MILLER et al
as 1:2021cv02505
Plaintiff:
BRANDON ADAMS
Defendant:
MARK MILLER, GREG SHELINE, TYLER O. MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. Boyd et al
as 3:2021cv00215
Defendant:
John T Boyd and Tiger Correctional Services
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. Quality Correctional Care LLC
as 3:2021cv00186
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Care LLC
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. LaPorte County of Indiana et al
as 3:2020cv01056
Defendant:
John Lake, Michael S Bergerson, LaPorte County of Indiana and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bray v. LaPorte Indiana County of et al
as 3:2020cv01003
Defendant:
Jimerson, John Lake, Tiger Correctional Services and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2020cv00855
Defendant:
Mark J Roule, Michael Bergerson and Indiana State of
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAUGHMAN v. BAKER et al
as 1:2020cv02154
Defendant:
JOHN DOES MEMBERS AND/OR EMPLOYEES OF THE HOWARD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, OFFICER KENNETH WINES, OFFICER ADAM MARTIN and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF GUSTIN MARTIN and COURTNEY LAUGHMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
