Cases 11 - 20 of 110
WATERMAN v. EMCLAIRE FINANCIAL CORP et al
as 2:2022cv02230
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
EMCLAIRE FINANCIAL CORP, WILLIAM C MARSH, DAVID L. COX and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
HARRIS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS BAUER HARRIS
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Riley v. Miller et al
as 1:2021cv01647
Plaintiff:
Daniel Riley
Defendant:
George Miller, James J. Cirellli, Joseph Grillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITFIELD v. KADMON HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04605
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
KADMON HOLDINGS, INC., TASOS G KONIDARIS, HARLAN W WAKSAL and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
ARNOLD v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2021cv00241
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ARNOLD
Defendant:
D. OBERLANDER, M. CROWIHER, D. BAUER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GAIL v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06266
Plaintiff:
BAUER GAIL
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMMONS v. BRANCA et al
as 2:2020cv06030
Defendant:
CATHY FORTUNE, PAUL BAUER II, JOHN GERADEL and others
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELTCH et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03432
Plaintiff:
MATT DELATOUR, KARLY SOLDNER, NINA FROGGATT and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-100 and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bauer v. Wenerowicz et al
as 3:2019cv01796
Plaintiff:
Michael Bauer
Defendant:
Kelly O'Kane, Denise A Stover and Michael Wenerowicz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS V. UPMC
as 2:2019cv00865
Defendant:
UPMC MAGEE HOSPITAL/CLINIC, UPMC MAGEE HOSPITAL/CLINICS, EMILY REDMAN and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY L. LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
