Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Romero v. City of Middletown et al
as 1:2019cv00307
Defendant:
Mark Clemons, Scott Belcher, Douglas Adkins and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew B. Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belcher et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op46143
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Belcher and Ella Louise Johnson
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Suttles et al v. Buckeye Family Residential Care Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01346
Plaintiff:
Kelli Suttles , Jessica Tucker , Heidi Phelan and others
Defendant:
Buckeye Family Residential Care Services, Inc. and Brad Belcher
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Belcher v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2016cv02580
Plaintiff:
Steven Lamont Belcher
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425
Belcher v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2016cv02006
Plaintiff:
Tanya R Belcher
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Belcher v. Turner
as 3:2015cv01875
Petitioner:
Timothy Belcher
Respondent:
Neil Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Belcher v. Advanced Maternal Imaging, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00167
Plaintiff:
Garth M Belcher
Defendant:
Advanced Maternal Imaging, LLC and Cardiosolution, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Marrero v. Will et al
as 1:2013cv01991
Plaintiff:
Tito E. Marrero
Defendant:
Dennis P. Will, Tony Cillo, Peter Gauthier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Belcher v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2012cv00985
Plaintiff:
Larry Belcher
Defendant:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, M Brown and J. Ridout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
