Cases 11 - 20 of 151
Sims v. Murphy et al
as 4:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Coradell V. Sims
Defendant:
Ben Murphy, Joseph Keene and Bill Rasco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Samudio v. DeSoto County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2021cv00244
Plaintiff:
Blaine Anthony Samudio
Defendant:
DeSoto County, Mississippi, Bill Rasco, Detective Trevor Blocker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Rasco et al
as 3:2021cv00109
Respondent:
Desoto County Sheriff, Bill Rasco, Desoto County Facility Director and others
Petitioner:
Christopher R. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Regions Bank et al v. Stites et al
as 1:2020cv00240
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank and LMIW VII, LLC
Defendant:
Russell Marion Stites, The United States Internal Revenue Service, Hitachi Capital America Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00300
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Montag v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv00325
Defendant:
Carlos Solis, Scott Montag, Sara OConnor and others
Plaintiff:
Mathew Montag
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Get Glam Beauty, LLC v. Stewart et al
as 3:2020cv00580
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch, Dorothy Ennis, Hilda Bills and others
Plaintiff:
Karrece Stewart and Get Glam Beauty, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Pike County Circuit Court et al
as 5:2020cv00137
Defendant:
Fred Gordon, D. Smith, Clerk Roger Graves and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Keith Barnett
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
