Cases 11 - 20 of 83
NUNEZ v. REESMAN et al
as 3:2020cv00146
Defendant:
CO BLAIN REESMAN, CO LANDON SINCLAIR, CO TRAVIS TRESSLER and others
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO NUNEZ, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JENNIE K. SCAIFE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION, INC. et al v. PNC BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2020cv00617
Plaintiff:
JENNIE K. SCAIFE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION, INC. and DAVID ZYWIEC
Defendant:
LAURA B. GUTNICK, FREDERICK G. WEDELL, II, CORBIN P. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMERON v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2020cv00332
Plaintiff:
BLAINE G. CAMERON
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Blaine v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01961
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
John David Blaine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GHOLSON v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00175
Defendant:
DAVID CLOSE, PEACE, PAMELA S. OLIVER and others
Plaintiff:
BLAINE KOBY GHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BROWN v. LEIS et al
as 2:2019cv04696
Defendant:
OFFICER BLAINE LEIS and UPPER MERION TOWNSHIP POLICE
Plaintiff:
DANIEL NYEMAH BROWN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GHOLSON v. ANDREWS et al
as 2:2018cv01632
Defendant:
REBECCA ANDREWS and ZACHARY KENNEDY
Plaintiff:
BLAINE KOBY GHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GHOLSON v. SHEEDER et al
as 2:2018cv01451
Defendant:
YOLANDA S. WEBB, LEE J. ESTOCK, FOGLE and others
Plaintiff:
BLAINE KOBY GHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GHOLSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
as 2:2018cv01412
Plaintiff:
BLAINE KOBY GHOLSON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GHOLSON v. SHEEDER et al
as 2:2018cv01280
Defendant:
MR. SOKIRA, WHEARY, LEE J. ESTOCK and others
Plaintiff:
BLAINE KOBY GHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
