Cases 11 - 20 of 47
(PC) Vega v. Soto et al
as 1:2022cv00471
Plaintiff:
Francisco Vega, Jr.
Defendant:
M. Soto, Borba and Noujaime
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hill v. Seibel, et al.
as 2:2021cv02382
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill and Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
Kimberly Seibel, Fennefer Weaver, Foseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BORBA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv36066
Plaintiff:
JASON C BORBA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez et al v. County of Stanislaus et al
as 2:2021at00632
Plaintiff:
Maria Teresa Gonzalez and H.G.
Defendant:
County of Stanislaus, Jeff Dirkse, Chad Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez et al v. County of Stanislaus et al
as 1:2021cv01091
Plaintiff:
Maria Teresa Gonzalez and H.G.
Defendant:
County of Stanislaus, Jeff Dirkse, Chad Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAGO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv01114
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO BORBA LAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hayes v. FT LA Cascada TIC, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv01801
Defendant:
Does 1 Through 10, FT LA Cascada TIC, LLC, Borba Investment Realty, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Hayes
Hill v. Borba et al
as 4:2020cv03255
Defendant:
Dr. Borba and M. Tyler
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julie Borba, M.D. v. The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2019cv04172
Defendant:
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Julie Borba, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
